The EU

Google says the EU requires a notice of cookie use (by Google) and says they have posted a notice. I don't see it. If cookies bother you, go elsewhere. If the EU bothers you, emigrate. If you live outside the EU, don't go there.

Friday, April 19, 2024

We can Handle the Truth, and Multiple Versions Thereof


For John, BLUFAs people become more and more protective of their own truth, including quashing other views, we become less and less free citizens, exercising our rights thereof.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From The Old Gray Lady, by Opinion Columnist David Brooks, April 18, 2024.

Here is the lede plus one:

Hilary Cass is the kind of hero the world needs today.  She has entered one of the most toxic debates in our culture: how the medical community should respond to the growing numbers of young people who seek gender transition through medical treatments, including puberty blockers and hormone therapies.  This month, after more than three years of research, Cass, a pediatrician, produced a report, commissioned by the National Health Service in England, that is remarkable for its empathy for people on all sides of this issue, for its humility in the face of complex social trends we don’t understand and for its intellectual integrity as we try to figure out which treatments actually work to serve those patients who are in distress.  With incredible courage, she shows that careful scholarship can cut through debates that have been marked by vituperation and intimidation and possibly reset them on more rational grounds.

Cass, a past president of Britain’s Royal College of Pediatrics and Child Health, is clear about the mission of her report:  “This review is not about defining what it means to be trans, nor is it about undermining the validity of trans identities, challenging the right of people to express themselves or rolling back on people’s rights to health care.  It is about what the health care approach should be, and how best to help the growing number of children and young people who are looking for support from the N.H.S. in relation to their gender identity.”

This issue begins with a mystery.  For reasons that are not clear, the number of adolescents who have sought to medically change their sex has been skyrocketing in recent years, though the overall number remains very small.  For reasons that are also not clear, adolescents who were assigned female at birth are driving this trend, whereas before the late 2000s, it was mostly adolescents who were assigned male at birth who sought these treatments.

Doctors and researchers have proposed various theories to try to explain these trends.  One is that greater social acceptance of trans people has enabled people to seek these therapies.  Another is that teenagers are being influenced by the popularity of searching and experimenting around identity.  A third is that the rise of teen mental health issues may be contributing to gender dysphoria.  In her report, Cass is skeptical of broad generalizations in the absence of clear evidence; these are individual children and adolescents who take their own routes to who they are.

Some activists and medical practitioners on the left have come to see the surge in requests for medical transitioning as a piece of the new civil rights issue of our time — offering recognition to people of all gender identities.  Transition through medical interventions was embraced by providers in the United States and Europe after a pair of small Dutch studies showed that such treatment improved patients’ well-being.  But a 2022 Reuters investigation found that some American clinics were quite aggressive with treatment:  None of the 18 U.S. clinics that Reuters looked at performed long assessments on their patients, and some prescribed puberty blockers on the first visit.

Unfortunately, some researchers who questioned the Dutch approach were viciously attacked.  This year, Sallie Baxendale, a professor of clinical neuropsychology at the University College London, published a review of studies looking at the impact of puberty blockers on brain development and concluded that “critical questions” about the therapy remain unanswered.  She was immediately attacked.  She recently told The Guardian, “I’ve been accused of being an anti-trans activist, and that now comes up on Google and is never going to go away.”

I see this article as having two main issues.

One issue is transgenderism.  I think Dr Cass is right to suggest go slow for gender dysphoria for young people.  If you are 23 or older I figure you are mature enough to make your own choices.  Before then it is child abuse.  (I would have said 21, but my co-host this morning said the age was 25 for full brain development.  She is a teacher of special needs children and a member of our School Committee.)

But, at another level transgenderism is abusive of those who are not.  Some day in the future this might not be true, but today it just throws more of a burden on women who are cis-women.  To sustain our population they, today, must produce 2.1 children.  In this generation my Middle Brother and Wife have one, my Youngest Brother and Wife three and Martha and myself three.  Seven.  Divided by 3 is 2.33.  We produced a surplus.  For my kids, three, two and four.  Nine.  Divided by three is 3.0.  A surplus.  But, if my Daughter had been transgender, then two and four, for six, divided by thee and you get 2.0.  Someone else has to make up that deficiency. Do the work others won't (can’t).  Which is why we need immigration, since they can do the work female US Citizens can’t or won’t.  Don’t blame me.  Blame nature and nature’s God.

As for the point, about scientific research, I think that we are in a period where it is not respected.  I liked the mention of British philosopher and mathematician William Kingdon Clifford.  Columnist Brooks throws shade at Republicans in this arena, but I think that is too narrow a view.  Look at COVID-19.  Any research that flowed differently from the views of Dr Anthony Fauci or Dr Birx was suppressed.  Look at either the Great Barrington Declaration or Ivermectin.  Or Mr Berliner, formerly of NPR.  We need more dialogue, more people challenging the conventional wisdom.  This morning I had a Democratic State Rep, at the end of a televised interview, asked me, given my views, why I am a Republican.  I took that as a genuine complement.  A diversity of views and an openness to discuss them is important to our progress as a society.

Hat tip to my Middle Brother.

Regards  —  Cliff

Thursday, April 18, 2024

NPR and Truth


For John, BLUFNPR is scamming the average taxpayer.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From The Washington Examiner, by Reporter Conn Carroll, 16 April 2024 10:50 am.

Here is the lede plus four:

Sometimes, a person enters the public spotlight and is such an embodiment of an established stereotype that it seems impossible for him or her to be a real person. If Tom Wolfe wanted to capture the essence of arrogant, alienated progressivism, he would reject NPR’s new CEO, Katherine Maher, as too unbelievably on point.

The daughter of wealthy parents whose wedding was announced in the New York Times, Maher grew up in a wealthy white suburb of New York City before studying at the American University in Cairo, the Institut français du Proche-Orient in Syria, and finally New York University.

She then got internships with the Council on Foreign Relations and Eurasia Group in London and Germany before landing a job in New York City at UNICEF. She had stops with the National Democratic Institute and the World Bank, among other global nonprofit groups, before rising to become the CEO of Wikimedia in 2019.

It would be impossible to create a resume of a person more disconnected from Americans and more intertwined with the wealthy, urban, globalist elite who run the largest banks, media companies, and nonprofit groups in the United States. In other words, Maher has the perfect resume to run NPR.

And her tweets prove she is the perfect person for the job.

My favorite comment, via "X", of new NPR CEO, Katherine Maher, is (via InstsPundit):
Our reverence for the truth might be a distraction that’s getting in the way of finding common ground and getting things done.
It appears Ms Maher did not get enouogh Superman when she was young.  The concept of "Truth, Justice and the American Way".

Without truth there can be no justice.  Without truth we are all just lying to ourselves and each other.  Ms Maher's line makes me think of another historic character, Pontius Pilate, who asks, "What is truth"?.

Mr Tom Knigjhton, at Tilting at windmills, wrote:

The problem is that, among other things, NPR is expected to be an unbiased news source. Most mainstream media outlets pretend to be, but NPR gets taxpayer money, which means it’s paid by all of us, be we liberal, conservative, libertarian, or some other flavor of ideology.

But as we now know, not only is their reporting not unbiased but there’s absolutely no interest in ideological diversity.

And there is the rub.  Neither CEO Maher, nor the News Room are interested in the truth or in the nuances that make news interesting.  So, they are scamming us.

Is this all Mr Trump's fault?  Would things have been different if, in 2016, the Republican Convdention had nominated Senator Cruz or Senator Rubio?  How about if they had given us Governor Sarah Palin?

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff
  Found in John's Gospel.

Looking Beyond Donald Trump


For John, BLUFIt isn't DJT, it is his voters, who were here before the Escalator Descent and will be here after the flag is folded over his casket. .  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From Ann Althouse Blog, by Professor ann Althouse.

Here is the lede plus three: "No one’s been harder on Trump than me. But I get it, and I’m bored with it. And there’s a different way to do this...."

"Not to defend Trump, but to defend the people who still vote for him. Because what they see on the other side, to them, is even more dangerous. Because it’s closer to home: 'My kid is coming home from school and he thinks he’s a racist? He’s five, what have you been telling him? My son thinks maybe he’s not a boy.' And maybe that’s true, that happens. Those kind of things are what they say. 'That’s why I’m voting for Trump.'"

Said Bill Maher, criticizing the mainstream commentators who endlessly express negativity toward Trump, quoted in "Bill Maher Defends Trump Voters in Contentious Katie Couric Sit-Down" (Daily Beast)(video at the link).

Maher is right. The media pundits should not be aiming disrespect and contempt at the millions of Americans who support Trump. They are voters, and they are human beings. The self-important experts ought at least to pretend to care about understanding and reaching them.

Enigma's Comment:

The Woke Democrat era ends not because of Trump, but because the do-or-die zealots force a critical mass of principled/center/sane Democrats out of the Party. Tulsi Gabbard, Joe Rogan, Bari Weiss, Matt Taibbi, Elon Musk, every Jew that doesn't want to be killed, Mr. "I am a Berliner" at NPR, and now the turtle-slow (but everyone saw it coming) Maher.
Wa St Blogger's Comment:
The self-important experts ought at least to pretend to care about understanding and reaching them.

No. What a stupid thing to say. That would be unconscionable. These people are evil and racist and Nazis. No option should be dismissed that would rid ourselves of these Neanderthals that infest our country. Thank God Biden is jailing them and importing better citizens. Hopefully we can create a permanent majority of enlightened people who are immune to the misinformation spewed by these reprehensible excuses for human beings.

Even my Progressive Brother understands that one needs to look beyond President Trump and view the people who support him, from the Tea Party on.

Hat tip to Ann Althouse.

Regards  —  Cliff

Monday, April 8, 2024

He's Back


For John, BLUFReporter Raymond Arroyo has been absent from my television screen for a while now, but tonight he was back.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From Hot Air, by Columnist Jazz Shaw, 27 March 2024, 5:00 PM.

Here is the lede plus three:

Anyone who watches Fox News on a semi-regular basis is probably familiar with Raymond Arroyo. He's been a Fox contributor since 2017 but particularly in the recent past he was most often seen working alongside Laura Ingraham on The Ingraham Angle. He was typically called on for some comic relief and he worked elements of humor into most of his features. But you may have noticed in recent weeks that he's been nowhere to be seen and the regular segments that he did with Ingraham are no longer showing up. As The Daily Beast put it, he seems to have simply vanished. But why? As it turns out, one of his jokes reportedly went several steps too far and it had to do with Donald Trump, Black voters, and... sneakers.
Fox News pundit Raymond Arroyo has vanished from the network’s airwaves since sparking backlash last month by claiming Black voters would support Donald Trump for president because “they love sneakers.”

A paid on-air contributor with the conservative cable giant since 2017, Arroyo is best known to Fox News viewers for his regular appearances on Laura Ingraham’s nightly program. In addition to his “Seen and Unseen” and “Friday Follies” segments, he has also served as a substitute host of The Ingraham Angle.

His near-daily presence on Ingraham’s program, however, suddenly came to a halt in late February after his on-air claim that Trump’s new sneakers would win him Black votes went viral in the worst way across social media and prompted widespread rebuke.

i was pleased to see Reporter Raymond Arroyo back on the Ingram Angle.  I like his humerous take on the news of the day.

By the way, those Gold Sneakers from Candidate Donald Trump go for $399.  Out of my price range, although the inflation under President Joseph Biden could make them in range if he is elected again.

My opinioin is that Fox News over-reacted.

Hat tip to my Wife for the original article.

Regards  —  Cliff

Squatter


For John, BLUFHow long will Citizens endure their homes being seized by illegal immigrants as squatters?  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From The New York Post, by Reporter Jorge Fitz-Gibbon, 7 April 2024, 3:17 p.m. ET.

Here is the lede plus four:

The Big Apple is seeing a troublesome trend of unwelcome squatters illegally bedding down in private homes and apartments in the five boroughs — and it’s gotten much harder to kick them out.

A backlog of housing court cases and changes in the law in recent years have made it a bigger and longer-lasting headache for landlords to boot unwelcome tenants, legal experts tell The Post.

“This is happening far more now than in the past,” real estate attorney Josh Price said. “Squatters have become far more sophisticated than before. They set up elaborate schemes, fake documents and investigate the homes before breaking in.”

Two changes in city law in 2019 now dictate that landlords can’t just boot a squatter without a “special proceeding,” and have to file a lawsuit to get them out.

Manhattan real estate lawyer Alan Goldberg said he’s seen a 10-to-20% bump in squatter cases over the past two years, attributing it to the migrant crisis, post-pandemic homelessness — and media coverage.

How long can this go on before we have a large number of homeless American Citizens, because their homes have been taken over by illegal immigrants squatting in their home.

Blogger Sarah Hoyt says:

The left has forgotten what happens when people lose faith in the courts and law. I’m very afraid a great lesson is coming.
. Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff

Monday, April 1, 2024

Who Is Being Taxed


For John, BLUFWe need to understand our tax system, to ensure our legislators are playing fair with all of us, rich and poor.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




Here is the sub-headline:

ITEP's latest study exposes how the 2017 tax law has allowed major U.S. corporations to drastically reduce their tax bills, highlighting the need for urgent reform in corporate taxation.

From Nation of Change, by Reporter Ruth Milka, 1 March 2024.

Here is the lede plus one:

A recent study by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP) has unveiled that numerous large, profitable U.S. companies have substantially reduced their federal tax bills, leveraging the provisions of the 2017 Trump-GOP tax law.  This legislation, which cut the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, has been under scrutiny for enabling lucrative loopholes that major corporations have exploited.

The 2017 Tax Law: A Catalyst for Corporate Tax Avoidance

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, hailed by its proponents for spurring economic growth, has faced criticism for diminishing corporate contributions to public investments.  “When President [Donald] Trump and congressional Republicans slashed the statutory corporate income tax rate… their goal was to allow corporations to contribute less to the public investments and the society that makes their profits possible,” the ITEP report elucidates.

The study focused on 342 profitable companies over the first five years since the law’s enactment, revealing that 23 of these companies paid no federal taxes during this period. Notably, Kinder Morgan, NRG Energy, and T-Mobile were among those with a 0% or negative effective tax rate. The analysis further disclosed that nearly a quarter of the examined companies, including giants like Netflix, Nike, and Citigroup, paid taxes at single-digit rates or less.

I know I should be upset by corporatoins not paying their fair share.  The thing is, when they pay their tax it is with my money.  The corporation doesn't create money out of nothing.  They create their wealth by selling things or services.  Who pays for those products or services?  You and I pay, and the corporate tacks on a little extra for profit.  Some of that is then raked off in Government Taxes.

It would seem to me that the appropriate place to tax is in terms of the dividends of those who have invested in individual corporations  For them it is income.

In the end, it is the consumer who is underwriting any taxes being paid by corporations.  It is coming out of your pocket.

That said, perhaps we cannot disentangle taxes from the concept that corporations are people, in term of free speech.

Regards  —  Cliff
  What is a fair share?  I hear the term, but I don't find definitions.  Do youhave a definition you could share

Friday, March 29, 2024

Ronna is Better Off


For John, BLUFWith the NBC news staff following in the wake of those folks at The New York Times, we are seeing the employees telling management how to operate, even if, in the long run, it isn't good for profits or the news.  Nothing to see here; just move along.




From PJ Media, by Commentator Stephen Kruiser, 26 March 2024, 3:55 PM.

Here is the lede plus three:

The reports of former Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel getting hired by NBC News didn't get much attention from me at first. It was very much a "Let them have each other" situation as far as I was concerned. My overwhelming dislike of Ms. Romney McD's tenure at the RNC has been well documented here.

The NBC News division, however, is far and away the worst of the behemoth disseminators of American leftist propaganda. It didn't take very long for its prevaricating horde of Democratic National Committee lapdogs to make even my icy heart want to side with McDaniel.

Sort of.

The brouhaha among regulars in the NBC News division is being presented as consternation over the fact that McDaniel is, according to them, an "election denier," the Left's grammatically clunky catch-all label for anyone who questions any part of any election. They're beating their cancel culture drums and pretending that they occupy the ethical high ground.

I would say Mr Stephen Kruiser is a little over the top in his comments on Ms Ronna McDaniel, former Republican National Committee Chairwoman.  She may have had a different drift from other Republicans, but she is a Republican and Republicans should have a big tent.  The real issue here is not Ms McDaniel, but the deplorable bigotry of the talking heads at NBC and MSNBC.

Take, for example, this Tweet by News Reader Chuck Todd:

The issue isn’t about ideology, it’s about basic truth. Those trying to make this a left-right issue are being intentionally dishonest. This is about whether honest journalists are supposed to lend their credibility to someone who intentionally tried to ruin ours.
5:49 PM · Mar 25, 2024
In what reality is Mr Todd living?  Why would he think the average Joe Schmoe would take him as the model of Journalism?  I woould not.  He comes from a barn yard of hacks who have only one way of viewing things and who are dismissive of those who do not align with them.

I believe Ms McDaniel is better off not being with NBC, and I suspect she will pocket a nice chunk of change.  In fact, if she is not compensated for this outrageous termination by the executive suite stiffs at NBC, she should sue them for several million dollars.  Now there is some news I could enjoy following.

Good Luck Ronna McDaniel.

Hat tip to the InstaPundit.

Regards  —  Cliff